# Lovely Linda

**URL:** <https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305>\
**Category:** The Archers\
**Created:** [28 April 2017 12:59 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305 "2017-04-28T12:59:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jade](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/a8b319/32.png) [@Jade](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Jade)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 12:59 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/1 "2017-04-28T12:59:58Z")

</div>

I forgive Lynda everything, all the panto rubbish, for the way she’s acted about those poor ponies. A woman after my own heart 😍

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gus](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/gus/32/11_2.png) [@Gus](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Gus)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 13:28 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/2 "2017-04-28T13:28:52Z")

</div>

Sorry, but a phone call to the vet - what else was she going to do anyway? - doesn’t weigh particularly heavily against the pernicious nuisance that she regularly makes herself.

Lynda is not lovely. She might be kindly disposed towards animals, but so what? So am I and I’m a howling bitch in other respects. Proves nothing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/fanta/32/98_2.png) [@Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Fanta)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 13:36 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/3 "2017-04-28T13:36:18Z")

</div>

I would like her better for it if she had not said something about hoping the owner would claim them.

What, she wants them back in the charge of a person who had treated a pony the way that mare had been treated? That’s not a nice person’s reaction.

If she had said “so that I can make sure he is prosecuted for the way he’s treated them” that would be fine, but she didn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JustJanie](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/justjanie/32/42_2.png) [@JustJanie](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/JustJanie)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 13:56 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/4 "2017-04-28T13:56:08Z")

</div>

> [@Fanta](#):
>
> I would like her better for it if she had not said something about hoping the owner would claim them.
> 
> What, she wants them back in the charge of a person who had treated a pony the way that mare had been treated? That’s not a nice person’s reaction.
> 
> If she had said “so that I can make sure he is prosecuted for the way he’s treated them” that would be fine, but she didn’t.

It’s more likely that she (or rather the scriptwriter) didn’t think through the implications of what she was saying. No way would Lynda want those ponies back in the hands of the people who mistreated them. People do say surprisingly stupid things, sometimes!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/fanta/32/98_2.png) [@Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Fanta)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 14:23 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/5 "2017-04-28T14:23:58Z")

</div>

I hope that you are right and if anyone is stupid enough to let Lynda know who they are, she will pursue them with her usual single-minded thoroughness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Used2B](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Used2B](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Used2B)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 15:09 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/6 "2017-04-28T15:09:17Z")

</div>

I think the TA producers may have realised that Lynda Lloyd-Webber and her blasted pantomimes are way past their sell buy date. They seem to be looking around for new nonsenses to involve her with.

Is she to be god’s gift to road-speed management? - I ruddy hope not. Or are we to have a Lynda of Assisi? (Nobody mention her Llamas or Lemmings, whatever they were).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/fanta/32/98_2.png) [@Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Fanta)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 15:15 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/7 "2017-04-28T15:15:32Z")

</div>

They have done Lynda And The Traffic Calming Measures before, in 1996.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Used2B](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Used2B](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Used2B)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 15:22 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/8 "2017-04-28T15:22:44Z")

</div>

So Lynda of Assisi, it is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jade](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/a8b319/32.png) [@Jade](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Jade)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 15:54 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/9 "2017-04-28T15:54:13Z")

</div>

I think like many of us Lynda prefers animals to a lot of people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/fanta/32/98_2.png) [@Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Fanta)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 15:55 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/10 "2017-04-28T15:55:03Z")

</div>

She has a soft spot for fairly unlikely people, too: she has been Kate’s confidante on more than one occasion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HedgeSparrow](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/hedgesparrow/32/124_2.png) [@HedgeSparrow](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/HedgeSparrow)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 16:05 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/11 "2017-04-28T16:05:48Z")

</div>

Wolfgang Wuz Done In.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gus](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/gus/32/11_2.png) [@Gus](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Gus)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 16:10 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/12 "2017-04-28T16:10:14Z")

</div>

Is her interaction with Kate actually that unlikely? I’d say that after Kate, Lynda is the person in the village with the greatest interest in/highest tolerance for what might broadly and lazily be termed ‘woo’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/fanta/32/98_2.png) [@Fanta](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Fanta)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 17:55 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/13 "2017-04-28T17:55:07Z")

</div>

In those days Kate was a thoroughly unpleasant brat.

She still is, of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Used2B](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Used2B](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Used2B)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 18:06 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/14 "2017-04-28T18:06:53Z")

</div>

They’re lovely roasted. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gus](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/user_avatar/discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/gus/32/11_2.png) [@Gus](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/u/Gus)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2017 18:18 UTC](https://discussion.ambridgereporter.org.uk/t/lovely-linda/305/15 "2017-04-28T18:18:58Z")

</div>

I wish there were a ‘Not Like’ facility. Meanie.🐺
