Phenomena (singular, apparently).
Ex-cetera (still)
Lorandorder
Soo xx
ExpressoâŚ
Carinthia.xx
Consonant clusters seem to be very hard for many people. Artic.
This has brightened my day.
ââŚthe last act that you do for your loved one, (unless youâre an Executer)â
âLike stealing candles from a baby.â
I am reading a book published in the 1930s in which someone deplores âeksetererâ.
Those awful announcements on the underground: 'Eggzit here for⌠"
While what you want is to bacon it here.
This doesnât irk me, as such, but it is certainly bizarre use of language from Professor Neil Ferguson of SAGE, quoted in this morningâs BBC news: "He also says âit is clearâ two doses of vaccine offers a high level of protection and even those who do get infected are âalmost certainly probably 50% less infectiousâ.
Almost certainly probably, WTF does that mean?
Good to know we can rely on a top scientist for precision.
I discovered in myself today a prejudice against the use of âwhereâ in contexts which cry out for either âwherebyâ or âin whichâ. âThis is a situation where we find people being baffledâ, for example, really wants to be âthis is a situation in which we find people being baffledâ, and âthe way where the explanation is clearâ desperately yearns to be âthe way whereby the explanation is clearâ.
I am thinking of founding a Society For The Protection Of.
You have also occasionally fulminated on the matter of âwhereâ in a place that âwhenâ might fill better.
And even in this thread, back in January.
All right, what is the excuse for the âasâ in this sentence?
âThen I hope you will find the solution to this problem equally as easily.â
(This is linked to a previous gripe but I cba to find it.)
Equally easy is more elegant I would think
But I could be wrongâŚ
He is trying to find a solution, so âeasilyâ (as in âlocate it easilyâ) is necessary. The âasâ seems to me to be redundant. Or else the âequallyâ is, of course.
Another redundancy is here: âit sounds like theyâre in as bad of trouble as we areâ.
Of? Why?
Splendid typo caught in the wild:
two kids with additional nerds
PosterX, 20:45 âŚânormalising of eating tiny amounts or having a very low bum because weâve all âlost sight of what a normal weight looks likeâ.â
PosterX, 20:46 âLow Bmi. Not bum.â
Gus < howls >
This isnât incorrect but it jars every time I see it:
âlike a tonne of bricksâ.
It should be ton, dammit. Even if it shouldnât. Bah!
âShort or long ton?â